Skyline of Richmond, Virginia

Philadelphia CLUW calls on labor to “Support Temple University workers!”

03.26.08

Dear CLUW members: Below is info on a rally to support Temple workers of AFSCME Local 1723, who have been working without a contract for six months. Many of them are CLUW members. Please come out to this rally is you can, April 1st.

In Solidarity,

Kathy Black
Philadelphia Coalition of Labor Union Women
————————————————————————————————————
TEMPLE EMPLOYEES & STUDENTS
Unite!

Stop Temple’s ALL Merit Pay Plan

Support:

· A Democratic Voice in the Work Place
· A Fair and Living Wage for All
· Decent and Affordable Health Care

RALLY FOR FAIRNESS

April 1, 2008
Noon Sharp
At the Bell Tower
In Front of Paley Library

Rain or Shine

Come Out and Be Counted
BRING YOUR
CO-WORKERS & FRIENDS

Union Rights Are Human Rights

This rally is sponsored by the Coalition of Labor Organizations and Unions at Temple (CLOUT)/ Student Labor Action Project (SLAP)/ Jobs with Justice. Participating CLOUT members are: AFSCME Local 1723, BUE Local 612/SEIU, IUOE Local 835, TAUP/AFT Local 4531, TUGSA/AFT Local 6290, PASNAP/Temple Local, HPAE/Episcopal, the Temple University Law Professors Bargaining Unit, 1199C, and SPFPA Local 511.

LABOR DONATED

Labor’s New Deal

03.26.08

The Nation article | posted March 20, 2008 (April 7, 2008 issue)

Labor’s New Deal
by Andy Stern

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080407/stern

It’s no accident that the New Deal followed by four years the presidency of Calvin Coolidge, who once famously declared, “The chief business of the American people is business.” The human cost of the Great Depression created a change in climate that became the philosophical underpinning of the New Deal: the business of the American people was the people themselves–all of the people–not just the tycoons who made the “Roaring Twenties” roar and then crash.

Of course, we are as far today from the New Deal as the New Deal was from the Civil War. We cannot expect that work will be valued and rewarded in a global economy by reflexively copying strategies from an industrial economy. Although our values stay the same, our strategies must change. In the 1930s, employers were local, so local unions were strategically aligned with their employers. Today capital has gone global, trade is global, finance is global and, most important, companies are global–so how can unions assist members by just acting locally? “Workers of the world unite” is no longer an ideological slogan; it is the basis of an effort SEIU embarked on four years ago to create global unions of workers who work for the same employers.

Moreover, almost all labor issues in the 1930s pitted American unions against American businesses. The relationship was almost always adversarial. Today, America needs to act more as a team and create a new plan to compete in a global economy. That plan must start with universal healthcare. We simply cannot compete if we are the only nation on earth that asks our businesses to put the cost of healthcare on our products.

While modern developments–the Internet, fiber optics, cellphones and a globalized workforce and economy–have resulted in a profound transformation of the American economy, they have not erased the basic debate about the proper role of government. Coolidge’s heirs today are corporatists who have succeeded in rolling back many elements of the New Deal and the subsequent reforms that helped create a great American middle class.

Roosevelt understood that in addition to government programs, a balanced economy requires strong labor unions. Then, as now, increased unionization created higher wages and benefits for both union members and unorganized workers. As unionization increased, the middle class grew. And as the percentage of workers represented by a union has declined in the past three decades, the disparity of wealth has increased.

Corporatists have persistently tried to weaken two of the New Deal pillars of economic fairness and redistribution: government and the law enacted in 1935 to give workers the freedom to form a union under the oversight of a National Labor Relations Board. In recent years, the NLRB has increasingly been dominated by corporate interests issuing rulings hostile to workers’ rights and creating new barriers to workers who want to form unions.

Today, more than half of all workers say they would join a union if they had the opportunity, yet less than 8 percent of private workers are in unions. Billion-dollar corporations hire professional “union avoidance consultants,” who gang up on workers in unending private interviews, require them to watch hours of antiunion videos in “captive audience” meetings, punish or fire key supporters, threaten wage cutbacks and closings. These corporations face no consequences for their actions or meaningless sanctions under the current weak law.

Where the New Deal once served to rebalance the power between labor and capital, we are now perilously out of balance. In recent years, CEO salaries have gone up more than 600 percent. Had we only tied CEO pay to the minimum wage in 1990, the minimum wage would be more than $23 an hour and the average production worker would make more than $110,000 a year.

This is why Congress needs to enact the Employee Free Choice Act: to permit workers the choice to unite their voices at work. The House of Representatives has already passed it, but Republicans blocked it in the Senate. Both Democratic presidential candidates support it, and its passage is critical to restoring fairness to the workplace.

As in 1935, America is faced with a choice. Is the role of government to serve the 99 percent of hard-working Americans or only corporations and the super-wealthy? The answer will lead to very different decisions on taxation, education, pensions and healthcare.

We need to take into account the vast changes that have occurred since the New Deal, and we must continually adjust as new changes take place. America still needs strong unions–as well as a government on the side of working people–as part of the solution to rebalance power, provide greater fairness, make work pay and ensure that the dreams of all American children can still come true.

Andy Stern is President of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).

Laborers’ Union re-affiliates with building trades department

03.26.08

April 2008, Allentown/Bethlehem/Easton edition of The Union News

Laborers’ Union re-affiliates with building trades department

By PAUL TUCKER
theunionnewsabe@aol.com

REGION, March 16th- The Laborers’ International Union of North America (LIUNA) in Washington, DC announced on March 13th they are reuniting with the national Building and Construction Trades Department.

According to Terry O’Sullivan, President of the Laborers’ International Union, the two organizations mutually resolved issues regarding the plan for the Settlement of Jurisdictional Disputes which governs how unions are given the right to perform specific work on jobsites, and regarding per capita voting, which allows for decision making based on the number of rank and file members each union has in the department.

The Building and Construction Trades Department of the American Federation of Labor and the Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), is an alliance of 13 craft unions representing approximately three million members. The unions represent workers employed within the construction industry.

The Laborers’ Union unaffiliated from the AFL-CIO several years ago and joined the Change to Win (CTW) labor federation. The union will remain affiliated with Change to Win under the agreement reached between the two parties.

“We left the building trades for principled reasons and we are going back for principled reasons. It is a positive reflection on the Laborers’ leadership, the Building and Construction Trades Department President Mark Ayers, Secretary-Treasurer Sean McGarvey and the entire Governing Board of Presidents that this day has come,” said Mr. O’Sullivan.

According to James Hartman, Business Manager of Laborers’ Union Local 1147 in Allentown, which represents LIUNA members throughout the Lehigh Valley, the reuniting with the building trades labor federation will have little effect on his union because Local 1174 remained affiliated with the Building and Construction Trades Council of the Lehigh Valley labor organization while the Laborers’ were not a part of the national organization. There are 20 local unions affiliated with the regional labor federation located at Liberty Street in Allentown.

Mr. Hartman told the newspaper he has been a member of Local 1147 since 1987 and was elected to his first three-year term as Business Manager of the union in 2006. His term will expire in June of 2009.

“We are extremely pleased to have the Laborers’ back once again as an important part of the Building Trades family. And the fact that this has occurred on the eve of our 100th anniversary celebration makes it even more special. I congratulate the Laborers’ International Union President Terry O’Sullivan for his willingness to continue a dialogue with the department and for maintaining, just like all of the members of the Building and Construction Trades Department Governing Board, a shared commitment to always putting the interests of rank and file members first,” said Mr. Ayers.

Mr. Hartman stated Local 1147 represents around 940 LIUNA members throughout seven counties of Pennsylvania including: Northampton, Lehigh, Monroe, Carbon, Berks, Lebanon and Schuylkill. The number includes 164 retired members.

“We welcome the Laborers’ Union family back wholeheartedly and without hesitation,” added Mr. Ayers.

Pennsylvania Labor Federation President unsure which candidate he will support

03.26.08

April 2008, Allentown/Bethlehem/Easton edition of The Union News

Labor Federation President unsure which candidate he will support

By PAUL TUCKER
theunionnewsabe@aol.com

REGION, March 17th- Democratic party super-delegate and the Pennsylvania American Federation of Labor and the Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) President William George told the newspaper he is “uncommitted” regarding which candidate he will support at the Democratic convention.

He said during a telephone interview on March 17th, that he has served since 1996, when Pennsylvania Governor Robert Casey named him, as one of the 188 Democratic Party super-delegates. The AFL-CIO President was added because of the influence organized labor has in elections.

Mr. George stated unions are divided on support for Senator Clinton or Senator Obama but either Democratic candidate will support organized labor and be better for the working people than the Republican candidate in November.

“This is the greatest time for the Democrat’s since FDR. This race is competitive and the turnout for the Pennsylvania primary will be high. It’s healthly for our members, and our country to have an election like this,” said Mr. George.

Most of the national unions affiliated with the Change-to-Win labor federation have endorsed Mr. Obama while some of the unions that are affiliated with the AFL-CIO have endorsed Mrs. Clinton.

The two largest unions in the nation have split their support for the two Democratic candidates.

The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) have endorsed Senator Obama while the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Union have endorsed Senator Clinton.
Both unions represent mostly public sector employees and workers employed in nursing and elderly care.

Meanwhile, national unions that represent workers employed within the industrial sector are also split in their support.

For example, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) Union endorsed Mr. Obama while the International Association of Machinist (IAM) Union supports Mrs. Clinton.

The building trade unions are also split.

For example the Bricklayers and Allied Craftsworkers (BAC) have endorsed Mrs. Clinton while the Pipefitters & Plumbers Union endorsed Mr. Obama.

“There is no decision to be made regarding the AFL-CIO endorsement. Both of these candidates would be great for labor. But under our constitution we can’t endorse” said Mr. George.

Bill George was first elected President of the Pennsylvania AFL-CIO in 1990. He is a member of the United Steelworkers of America (USW) Union. “In 2000, thirty percent of all votes cast in Pennsylvania came from the labor movement. In 2004, twenty-nine percent of all votes cast were from union households. This year, organized labor will have a lot of influence on who wins,” added Mr. George.

Mr. George said he would likely support at the convention the person receiving the most votes in Pennsylvania’s primary election on April 22nd.