Skyline of Richmond, Virginia

Congressional candidate John Callahan endorsed by Pennsylvania AFL-CIO

08.31.10

SEPTEMBER 2010, Allentown/Bethlehem/Easton edition of The Union News

Congressional candidate John Callahan endorsed by Pennsylvania AFL-CIO

BY PAUL TUCKER
THEUNIONNEWSABE@AOL.COM

REGION, August 17th- The United States House of Representatives (15th Legislative District) Democratic candidate, Bethlehem Mayor John Callahan, has received the endorsement of the Pennsylvania State American Federation of Labor and the Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) in Harrisburg for the November election. Mr. Callahan and Independent candidate Jake Towne are challenging incumbent Republican Congressman Charlie Dent.

In the Primary election in May, Mr. Dent defeated fellow Republican Matt Benol while Mr. Callahan had no challengers.

Mr. Dent is seeking a fourth two-year term in representing the Lehigh Valley in Washington, DC. Mr. Dent’s labor voting record has decreased each term since first being elected. He voted against raising the minimum wage, voted against providing loans to the American automobile makers and voted against the Employee Free Choice Act/Card Check (EFCAct).

AFL-CIO delegates met on August 12th and announced Mr. Callahan was endorsed by the labor federation for the November election.

The newspaper previously reported Mr. Callahan summitted a AFL-CIO candidate questionnaire indicating he would support the labor community if elected.

According to the questionnaire, Mr. Callahan would vote for passage of EFCAct.

He would also oppose a national “right-to-work” bill that would prohibit unionized workers and their employers from voluntarily agreeing to “union security” contract language. He vowed to support the raising of the federal minimum wage and automatic adjustments on an annual basis of the mimimum wage.

EFCA’s Dead, but Fear of It Still Driving Anti-Worker Measures

08.24.10

EFCA’s Dead, but Fear of It Still Driving Anti-Worker Measures

By Mike Elk

IN THESE TIMES article link

Months after Arizona politicians passed S.B. 1070, the controversial and now delayed immigration law, the right wingers are going on the attack against not just hispanic workers, but all workers.

Earlier this month, Gov. Jan Brewer called a special session of the legislature into session to put an anti-union amendment on the November ballot. If voters approve the measure, it would block any charges to labor law made by federal passage of the proposed Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA).

Eight other states have similar measures on their respective ballots that aim to do the same thing. For a variety reasons, many legal scholars question whether these measures are even constitutional—one reason being that Congress never actually passed the Employee Free Choice Act. In fact, early this month the Arizona Supreme Court ruled that as crafted, the amendment is illegal.

Beyond that obvious obstacle, the larger question is: Why would big business and its Republican allies in the Arizona legislature want to push the measure if card check (as EFCA was often referred to) is already dead? Answer: They want to crush the ability of organized labor to shape the overall political agenda.

They want to beat up labor so badly that they will never push for EFCA again. The Chamber of Commerce keeps pushing against the bill because they want to push unions back into making concessions on weakening current law. We have already seen the success of Big Business to change the political dynamic by its ability to stop the routine nomination of Craig Becker to the NLRB.

Organized labor spent tens of millions of dollars to fight for EFCA, and it got nothing in the way of labor law reform in return. Instead, labor’s defeat and the loss of the public narrative about the role of unions have created political openings for big business to go on the attack against labor.

If labor had passed even a compromised version of the Employee Free Choice Act, we would have never had the problems over appointing Democrats to the National Labor Relations Board. Instead, Democrats fumbled on offensive and labor finds itself on the defensive once again.

Big Business was able to so successfully tar and feather labor that now we are seeing dramatic changes in the way the public views labor. As a result, the popularity of U.S. unions is at a 70-year low—a Pew survey this year showed that unions had a favorability rating of 41 percent, down dramatically from 58 percent in 2007.

Public employees and their pension funds are under attack all over the country as a result of the negative public narrative against unions. The public hysteria against union is so high that even labor’s allies and its own union members are turning against organized labor.

The person helping to lead the attack against unions in New Jersey is an Ironworkers union leader himself, Democratic State Senate President Stephen Sweeney. Sweeney was quoted in the New York Times saying “I’m a labor leader, but I’m also elected to do right by all the people in the state of New Jersey, and not just union members.”

Let the example of Sweeney serve as a stern lesson to the labor leaders who stayed silent and made a deal with Rahm Emanuel to wait to push EFCA until after healthcare “reform” passed. If you don’t stand up to the corporate interests and their political allies, you will be forced to sit down and work on their side. Any time you don’t take advantage of even a small opportunity to win, your opponents will turn it into an even greater defeat.

As one of my mentors, legendary DC press man Toby Chaudhuri, is famous for saying, “If you’re not winning, you’re losing. If you’re not defining yourselves, your opponents are defining you.” Labor’s defeat on EFCA has allowed Big Business to increasingly define organized labor’s power, and the public’s perception of it.

————————

EDITOR’S NOTE: I advise readers to check out this article at the original IN THESE TIMES link. It has many embedded links not reproduced here.

Stimulating Hypocrisy: 114 Lawmakers Block Recovery While Taking Credit For Its Success

08.24.10

Stimulating Hypocrisy: 114 Lawmakers Block Recovery While Taking Credit For Its Success

http://thinkprogress.org/touting-recovery-opposed/

This is a very detailed, well-documented list. Please look for your member of Congress and publicize what you find in your local media, community and blogs.

Unemployment rate could remain high for more than decade

08.13.10

AUGUST 2010 Scranton/Wilkes-Barre/Hazleton edition of The Union News

Unemployment rate could remain high for more than decade

BY PAUL LEESON
THEUNIONNEWSSWB@AOL.COM

REGION, July 28th- According to a new report released by the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), a left leaning economic and social issue think tank in Washington, DC, the job growth path comparable to the last economic recovery indicate the economy will not recover all the jobs lost in the recession until March 2014. Assuming the trend rate of growth in the labor force, the unemployment rate will not fall back to the pre-recession level until April 2021.

“The economy desperately needs action on job creation. At current and projected job creation rates, we will still be suffering from the effects of the downturn well into the next presidential term,” said John Schmitt, a senior economist at CEPR and a co-author of the report called, “The Urgent Need for Job Creation.”

The study compares various job growth scenariors with the job loss seen in the recession and projects when the lost jobs will be regained and when the unemployment rate will return to pre-recession levels in each case.

The study concludes considering more rapid periods of growth, the analysis shows that using the fastest period of growth of the 1990’s expansion, the economy goes not create enough new jobs to return to the pre-recession unemployment level until September 2014.

If even faster growth rates of the mid-1970’s and early 1980’s are applied, the economy returns to December 2007 employment levels in November 2011 and pre-recession unemployment rates by October of 2012.

Current projections indicate that future job growth will fall somewhere between the rates of the two most recent expansions, Mr. Schmitt believes.

This will mean that absent serious job creation policies, the economy will not reach pre-recession levels until well after the 2012 election cycle (June 2013) and not return to an unemployment rate near the pre-recession level until August of 2015, the study suggest.

The organization believes recent calls for additional stimulus spending and the stiff opposition of the extension of unemployment benefits by Republicans in Congress, shows that many in Washington, DC are underestimating the profound effect of the current recession on the labor market.

Does U.S. Rep. Charlie Dent Agree With His Leader John Boehner That Pennsylvania Cops, Fire Fighters, and Teachers Are Nothing But “Special Interests”?

08.09.10

www.americansunitedforchange.org

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Lauren Weiner, 202-470-5870 or Jeremy Funk, 202-470-5878

August 9, 2010

Does U.S. Rep. Charlie Dent Agree With His Leader John Boehner That Pennsylvania Cops, Fire Fighters, and Teachers Are Nothing But “Special Interests”?

Republican House Leader John Boehner Reacts to Vote Tomorrow on Emergency Job-Saving State Assistance by Insulting Pennsylvania’s First Responders and Educators

Will Dent Condemn Boehner’s Statements – or Join Him in Voting to Fire Thousands of Pennsylvania Public Service Workers?

Washington DC – Americans United for Change challenged U.S. Rep. Charlie Dent to condemn outrageous statements made by House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) that legislation to provide emergency state assistance that will save the jobs of 290,000 public service workers — including teachers, police officers, firefighters and nurses – amounts to a “pay off” to “special interests.”

Tom McMahon, Executive Director, Americans United for Change: “Republican House Leader John Boehner isn’t just out of touch with reality, he must be out of his mind if he thinks the folks working hard every day to educate our children and who are putting their lives on the line to keep us safe are nothing but “special interests.” Boehner has offered no apologies for insulting Pennsylvania’s cops, teachers, nurses, and fire fighters, and Congressman Charlie Dent’s constituents deserve to know: does he stand behind his leader?”

“Considering the Republican House Leader has perhaps the coziest relationships in Washington with CEO’s and lobbyists for the big Wall Street banks, big Oil, and the big insurance companies, he’s the last guy you’d expect to be preaching about “special interests.” Like Boehner, Representative Dent has taken money hand over fist from the real special interests and voted to protect their bottom line time and again over the interests of middle-class families in Pennsylvania.”

“But tomorrow, Representative Dent will have an opportunity to get his priorities straight by voting for emergency state assistance that will ease the burden on cash-strapped local governments and protect the jobs of nearly 300,000 Americans,” added McMahon. “Make no mistake: a vote against this emergency aid is a vote to fire hundreds of thousands cops, fire fighters and teachers across America and to leave those remaining stretched to the breaking point. Will Rep. Dent stand with Pennsylvania’s brave first responders and educators, or will he stand with his Leader that considers them nothing but “special interests?”

FACT SHEET: The U.S. House is set to vote Tuesday on an emergency state assistance bill that:

1. Saves and creates 290,000 American jobs (140,000 teacher jobs saved and 150,000 jobs created or saved, including police officers, firefighters and nurses).

2. These funds are needed immediately to prevent layoffs or actually rehire teachers and prevent law enforcement officers from losing their jobs.

3. Completely paid for, in part by closing tax loopholes that encourage corporations to ship American jobs overseas.

4. Cuts the deficit by $1.4 billion over 10 years, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office.

SOURCE: http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?p=2439

Is the Republican Victory Plan Another Great Depression?

07.31.10

Is the Republican Victory Plan Another Great Depression?

It seems like the Republicans in Congress have decided that sabotaging economic recovery and employment growth is their best tactic for electoral gains in the November elections. Indications of this plan have been around since the Democratic victories in 2008. It seems that all doubt about facilitating the economic downturn as a path to political power for Republicans have been removed by recent legislative votes.

Economic recessions and depressions almost always result from insufficient “effective” consumer demand for goods and services produced domestically. In economic terms, wanting something is not “effective demand” . For a want to become a demand for goods or services, it must accompany the desire to buy with the ability to actually purchase. Money is required.

Jobs are not created by just having large pools of investment money available. There must be the opportunity to invest in a business that will have customers who can buy the goods and services before the investment money flows into job creation activities. The Republican Right economic theory that economic prosperity and employment ” trickle-down from the wealthy” has proven to be unsound by historical experience.

Tax cuts for the wealthy create huge investment money pools but not jobs. Our nation has plenty of money setting idle in corporate and personal coffers. Corporations have almost a trillion dollars setting essentially idle in corporate accounts at this time.

Republicans are seeking to extend the tax cuts for the wealthy by falsely stating that increases in taxes for the upper 2% of income earners would hurt demand and prolong the economic downturn. Experience and history prove otherwise.

Tax cuts at the highest marginal incomes brackets do concentrate wealth and political power in the hands of the economic elite. The resulting political power by the economic elite pushes government policy in directions that dramatically cut the percentage of the nation’s wealth and income held by the vast majority of Americans. This reduces the ability of most Americans to buy goods and services. As a result, the economy unwinds because customers do not have enough disposable income to keep the flow of goods and services at a healthy economic level. The former middle class disposable income now controlled by the economic elite funds speculation and unsound “bubbles” in the economy instead of a healthy economy because sound businesses now lack paying customers.

Deregulation helps corporations charge excessive prices. Not enforcing anti-monopoly laws permits price gouging. Not capping interest rates concentrates wealth and reduces consumer spending. Outsourcing jobs to foreign nations reduces incomes available to buy goods and services. Union-busting keeps wages and benefits down which undermines the purchasing power of workers.

Privatizing government services costs consumers more in out of pocket expenses once provided by government. This reduces disposable income for these consumers. When employers reduce benefits and increase co-pays, it increases the cost-of-living for workers. As a result, these workers have less disposable income to spend on goods and services.

Middle class tax cuts do help the economy because they increase the disposable income of those members of society who spend the vast majority of their incomes and have little left over to save. The money changes hands over and over again instead of setting idle. This is the multiplier effect in economics.

Extending unemployment benefits has a huge multiplier effect. This is because unemployment benefits are so low that essentially all of it gets spent on goods and services immediately.

Excessive concentration of wealth and income unwinds our economy. All the Republican policies for the past 100 years have been designed to concentrate wealth and income in the hands of the very few. Every time they reach the economic concentration levels that currently exist, we have a serious depression. This is a direct result of increasingly “Republicanized” governmental policies over the previous 30 years.

Economic concentration of wealth and income are currently at levels very similar to those just before the Great Depression in 1929. The only reason our current situation has not quite deteriorated to that of the last Great Depression is that the Republicans have not been completely successful in undoing the reforms put in place as a result of the New Deal. Despite repeated attacks by Republicans our social safety net remains only damaged but not destroyed. It is not from lack of trying by Republican politicians.

Republican attempts to gut Social Security continue. Privatization keeps coming back to threaten the stability and viability of Social Security. Cutting Social Security benefits instead of increasing revenue seems to be the most effective avenue for the current attack. This approach is being pushed by most Republicans and some corporatist Democrats. A wiser economic approach would be to remove the income ceiling over which Social Security tax is not paid.

Why should almost all workers be taxed at over 13% while those making a million a year are paying closer to 1% and those making 10 million dollars a year are taxed at around 1/10th of 1% on their income? Social Security taxes are the most regressive tax system I know of in our current system. The poor and middle classes pay much, much more in percentage terms than the wealthy.

For decades, working people have been paying in far more than the current needs for each respective year of Social Security payments. These surpluses were “borrowed” by the federal government so they could fund annual deficits created by cutting taxes for the wealthiest Americans, cutting taxes on corporations by huge margins and nearly eliminating taxes on imports. It is only fair that corporations, wealthy Americans and foreign exporters selling in the American market pay higher taxes to fund these previous decades of “borrowing” since they reaped the benefits of that “borrowing”.

Republicans only want to look at cutting benefits instead of making Social Security taxes fairer by equalizing the Social Security tax rate for all income levels! These Republicans do not want to pay back the Social Security tax money borrowed by the federal government to fund tax cuts for the wealthy, fight two wars on credit and allow the near elimination of taxes on imports.

Sound economics says government should run surpluses in good economic times and deficits during economic downturns. Following this advice helps reduce the severity of economic cycles. Under the Republican Presidencies of Reagan and both George Bushes, we did exactly the opposite and created both the current downturn and the debt crisis. The vast majority of our total national debt developed under these three conservative Republican Presidents.

Currently, the Republicans in Congress have fought every measure to increase employment and help small businesses. They have fought all kinds of economic reforms that would curb corporate abuses of consumers, shareholders or workers. They have fought all attempts to curb excessive corporate political or economic power. They have been against any measures that would increase demand for goods and services or levels of employment.

By their actions, it is hard not to conclude that the Republicans want to worsen the economic downturn until it reaches Great Depression levels. The economic downturn was created by “Republicanizing” our economy and the Republicans want to blame the Democrats instead! With tons of corporate money behind them and a corporate dominated media helping them, it might just work.


Written by Stephen Crockett (host of Democratic Talk Radio http://www.DemocraticTalkRadio.com and Editor of Mid-Atlantic Labor.com http://www.midatlanticlabor.com). Mail: 698 Old Baltimore Pike, Newark, Delaware 19702. Email: demlabor@aol.com. Phone: 443-907-2367.

Feel free to publish without prior approval.

Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate Joe Sestak likely to receive labor support

07.26.10

August 2010, Allentown/Bethlehem/Easton edition of The Union News

Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate Joe Sestak likely to receive labor support

BY PAUL TUCKER
THEUNIONNEWSABE@AOL.COM

REGION, July 17th- Delegates of the Pennsylvania American Federation of Labor and the Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) will meet on August 12th and Democratic Pennsylvania United States Senatorial candidate Joe Sestak will likely be endorsed by the labor federation over former Lehigh Valley Republican Congressman (15th Legislative District) Pat Toomey. While serving three two-year terms in Washington, DC, Mr. Toomey supported pro-labor legislation less than ten percent of the time.

Pro-business organizations, including the United States Chamber of Commerce, are sponsoring television advertisements across Pennsylvania attacking Mr. Sestak.

In May Mr. Sestak defeated the AFL-CIO supported incumbent Democratic Senator Arlen Specter to become their party’s nominee for the November election.

Mr. Sestak did receive support from the labor community in the May election including from the United Food and Commerical Workers (UFCW) Union Local 1776 and the United Steelworkers of America (USW) Union Local 2599 in Bethlehem.

After the AFL-CIO meets on August 12th and announces which political candidates the labor federation will support in the November election, the labor community will conduct educational programs requesting union members’ support the candidates. Mr. Sestak will likely be one of those candidates.

Recently, two Pittsburgh television stations removed anti-Sestak advertisements paid for by the Chamber of Commerce because they inaccurately stated what Mr. Sestak’s voting record is while serving in the House of Representatives.

The Tea Party “Catch 22”

07.18.10

The Tea Party “Catch 22”

The Tea Party movement has started to come unglued over a series of internal contradictions that amount to an identity crisis. The Tea Party is caught in a “Catch 22” position that has largely been ignored by the corporate mainstream media.

Just this morning I watched a local PBS show where a Republican operative claimed that the Tea Party movement was not “Republican, Right Wing or racist.” The comment appears to be the Republican Right Wing official spin on all things “Tea Party” in nature. Unfortunately, the claim really lacks credibility because it conflicts with the facts on the ground all over the nation.

Anyone who really watched the development of the Tea Party movement, as part of the anti-healthcare reform effort, understands that it was a creation of Fox News and corporate funded Right Wing Republican operatives. Despite many claims to the contrary, it brought very few new faces into the political process.

What the Tea Party public relations campaign did was simply “re-brand” the various largely discredited, Right Wing fringe elements in the Republican Party under a new name. It did con the mainstream corporate media very effectively into calling blatant corporatist, economic elitist policies “populist.” It was a bad joke that the media completely missed or just ignored.

Like the fake ACORN pimp and voter registration scandals, the storyline falls apart completely when the details are examined in any detail. The spin relies on manufactured “facts” that are really outrageous lies being told over and over again. In time, the storyline falls apart but often the damage has been done. It appears the mainstream corporate media has learned absolutely nothing from their Iraq War-Weapons of Mass Deception experience.

The reality is that there is probably not much of a Tea Party movement outside of Republican Right Wing corporate control. When it comes to economic populism, the Tea Party has either been completely missing in action or in outright opposition to every proposal that is populist in nature.

Our middle class has been under constant attack by corporate forces for decades. The Reagan-Bush Republicans have been pushing changes in government policy that benefit only the most elite of economic elitists for 30 years. American workers are being driven out of the middle class by government policy and market power. The Republican Right has successfully placed many of the levers of power in government in the hands of the corporatist economic elite. Some Democrats assisted parts of this corporate take-over of government but it was overwhelmingly Republican effort.

The government is not the enemy if it is controlled by the majority of middle class Americans. It is a check on excessive corporate power under those circumstances.

The genius behind the Tea Party campaign is that it is a corporate created public relations/political campaign designed to promote pro-corporate economic policies via government while calling the movement “anti-corporate and anti-government.” The racism angle is a just a way to hook “poor and middle class whites” into an effort designed to economically benefit the wealthiest of the wealthy at the expense of “the poor and middle class of all colors.”

Racism has long been used to divide working Americans up along color lines so they do not demand a better deal from the economic and political elite. Racism serves an economic purpose and always has served an economic purpose. Racism is a sucker bet for working Americans. It has been a key element in building the Tea Party movement and the Republican Party since Richard Nixon. Republican Right wing economic policies are a disaster for 90% of Americans and social wedge issues including race have been the key to Republican victories for more than a generation.

If the Tea Party was really a new creature, it would be fielding third party candidates everywhere under the Tea Party name. Republican and Right Wing operatives claim it is independent of the Republican Party but at the same time strongly oppose real independence. The Republican Party is the Tea Party. The Tea Party is just the most extreme elements of the Republican Party devoted to driving any remaining moderates out of the Republican Party.

You cannot support Pat Toomey-Club for Growth economic policies and still claim to be a populist movement. You have to support economic policies that increase the wages of American workers, support government measures to help the unemployed, curtail the ability of corporations to move jobs outside the United States and sell untaxed imports in our country, shift the tax burden back in the direction of corporations and the Super Wealthy instead of putting it on the middle classes and seek to regulate corporate market power to be an economic populist.

Economic populists do not make excuses for BP like Rand Paul or Sharon Angle. Economic populists do not oppose government deficits during a severe economic downturn nor support government deficits in good economic times, like the Republicans are doing. Opposing better access to affordable healthcare is not a populist position. Giving massive tax cuts to wealthy people while our government is running massive deficits and local governments are firing teachers, firefighters and police is simply stupid economics and has nothing to do with economic populism.

If the Tea Party is” populist” in nature, as they claim, then the policies they support should demonstrate that populism. If the Tea Party is independent of the Republican Party, then they should field independent candidates in the November general elections to prove their independence. If the Tea Party is not racist, then they should condemn the expression of racism from within their movement every time they occur. If the Tea Party is not an expression of extreme Right Wing sentiments, then they should stop supporting the political agenda of the Far Right.

American voters will learn in coming months just how fake and flakey the Tea Party con job is by watching the Tea Party Republicans seeking office in November. You will learn nothing about this from Fox News but the mainstream media should not drop the ball on this story in 2010. The voters deserve a real discussion about the unreality of the Tea Party reality.

Written by Stephen Crockett (Host of Democratic Talk Radio http://www.DemocraticTalkRadio.com ). Mail: 698 Old Baltimore Pike, Newark, Delaware 19702. Phone: 443-907-2367. Email: demlabor@aol.com.

Feel free to publish without prior approval.

REPUBLICANS JUST DON’T LIKE THE UNEMPLOYED, CONT’D….

07.13.10

July 12, 2010
REPUBLICANS JUST DON’T LIKE THE UNEMPLOYED, CONT’D….

I’ve been marveling in recent months at the ways in which Republican lawmakers and candidates seem to actively dislike — on a personal level — those who’ve lost their jobs in the recession. It’s kind of odd, given that the unemployed don’t seem to have done anything to offend the GOP and earn the party’s disdain.

In the latest example, we see Pennsylvania Attorney General Tom Corbett (R), the frontrunner in this year’s gubernatorial race, arguing publicly that jobless workers in his state are choosing not to work, preferring to live on meager unemployment aid.

Republican gubernatorial candidate Tom Corbett on Friday accused some jobless Pennsylvanians of choosing to collect unemployment checks rather than going back to work, prompting swift criticism from his Democratic opponent and one of the state’s top labor leaders.

“The jobs are there. But if we keep extending unemployment, people are just going to sit there,” Corbett told Harrisburg radio station WITF at a campaign stop in Elizabethtown. “I’ve literally had construction companies tell me, ‘I can’t get people to come back to work until . . . they say, “I’ll come back to work when unemployment runs out.” ‘ ”

I obviously can’t speak with confidence about what some guy told some other guy who in turn told Corbett. But the general argument is getting quite tiresome.

“The jobs are there”? No, they’re really not. Nationwide, there are five applicants for every one opening, which is a terribly painful ratio. Pennsylvania’s unemployment rate is currently at a 26-year high.

Corbett not only seems confused about economic conditions, but his animosity about the jobless’ attitudes is awful. Yes, I can appreciate the fact that an unemployed worker who’s exhausted his/her benefits will be more desperate to take any job than an unemployed worker who’s still receiving public aid. But this dynamic matters a whole lot more when there are plenty of job opportunities for those who want them. That’s just not the current reality.

To hear Corbett tell it, the unemployed prefer to be unemployed — turning down job opportunities that pay more, choosing to rely on aid that offers far less. Worse, Corbett doesn’t seem to realize that his approach makes the larger problem worse — cutting people off from unemployment benefits undercuts consumer spending, which in turn leads to less demand and fewer job opportunities……

Read the rest of this article at

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024674.php

Representative requesting coal miners should be honored on postage stamp

07.11.10

JULY 2010 Scranton/Wilkes-Barre/Hazleton edition of The Union News

Representative requesting coal miners should be honored on postage stamp

BY PAUL TUCKER
THEUNIONNEWSSWB@AOL.COM

REGION, June 29th- The Pennsylvania House of Representatives adopted union member Eddie Day Pashinski (Democrat-121st Legislative District) resolution offering condolences to the families of the 29 miners who died in a coal explosion in the Upper Branch Mine-South in Raleigh County, West Virginia in April.

Mr. Pashinski also announced he is urging the United States Postal Service (USPS) to honor the efforts of the American coal miner and issue a United States postage stamp honoring coal miners and their families.

Mr. Pashinski is requesting that Congress recognize the sacrifice of the more than 100,000 miners who have died in the course of coal mining in the United States by placing the image of the American coal miner on the face of a stamp.

“The time has come to honor the exhausting and dangerous work performed by generations of coal miners who have powered the past and continue to power the future of this great nation,” Mr. Pashinski stated.

He stated the resolution recommends that states, including Pennsylvania, review their coal mine safety rules.

Pennsylvania Teachers Union’s support pension legislation

07.11.10

July 2010, Allentown/Bethlehem/Easton edition of The Union News

Pennsylvania Teachers Union’s support pension legislation

BY PAUL LEESON
THEUNIONNEWSABE@AOL.COM

REGION, June 16th- The Pennsylvania House of Representatives passed a comprehensive pension reform bill on June 16th that tempers the dramatic spike in pension costs faced by the state and school districts and creates new rules for future employees in an effort to stabilize the finances of public pension funds in future decades.

House Bill number 2497 passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 192 to 6 and now moves to the Senate for consideration.

The measure includes two key elements: mitigating the skyrocketing employer contribution costs faced by the state and school districts by changing the systems’ funding methodologies, and reducing benefits for future state and public school employees.

Under the plan, increased costs to the state and school districts would be capped by a set percentage that increases each year for four years up to 4.5 percent. The increase for subsequent years would remain at 4.5 percent until such a time as the increased costs borne by the state and school districts are less than what is required.

Once that level of payment is reached, neither the state nor the school districts would be permitted to contribute less than the “normal cost” to maintain benefits as determined by actuaries. Meanwhile the state’s two school employees unions, the American Federation of Teachers of Pennsylvania (AFT) and the Pennsylvania State Education Association (PSEA), are supporting the legislation.

“Our organization supports the legislation as a balanced solution to address pension concerns, while preserving the defined benefits pension system for current and future school employees and reducing costs to taxpayers in 2011 and beyond,” said James Testerman, President of the PSEA.

“This bill helps preserve and protect jobs and quality education now, and keeps the promise of a secure retirement in the future,” stated Ted Kirsch, President of the AFT of Pennsylvania.

The PSEA is not affiliated with the American Federation of Labor and the Congress of Industrial Organization (AFL-CIO) in Washington while the AFT is affiliated with the labor federation.

Under the amendment, new public school employees will contribute 7.5 percent of their pay to their pension, currently they pay 6.25 percent.

Alliance for American Manufacturing Video by Baltimore Music Happenings

07.06.10

From Maurice Morales

July 6, 2010 at 8:30am

Subject: Alliance for American Manufacturing Video by Baltimore Music Happenings

- MySpace Video http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=101605682

from a rally i videotaped resently.please share www.youtube/maurice11 for more of my work

Free Trade Agreement with Korea will cost U.S. jobs

07.01.10

Free Trade Agreement with Korea will cost U.S. jobs
Robert E. Scott
July 1, 2010

The Obama administration has announced that it intends to finalize a new free trade agreement with South Korea (KORUS FTA) in time for the next G-20 summit in November. Although the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) projects this will have a small positive impact on the U.S. trade balance, and “minimal or negligible “ impact on U.S. employment, history shows that such trade deals lead to rapidly growing trade deficits and job loss in the United States.

The Charts below compare USITC’s estimates of the impact of the forthcoming free trade agreement with Korea to EPI’s own calculation. Unlike USITC’s forecast of a small positive impact, EPI’s research shows it will increase the U.S. trade deficit with Korea by about $16.7 billion, and displace about 159,000 American jobs within the first seven years after it takes effect…..

Click on this link to see charts mentioned above EPI link

Senate Republicans Kill Jobs Bill, Block Jobless Aid

06.18.10

Senate Republicans Kill Jobs Bill, Block Jobless Aid

by Mike Hall

http://blog.aflcio.org/2010/06/18/senate-republicans-kill-jobs-bill-block-jobless-aid/

Senate Republicans last night blocked a jobs bill that would have extended unemployment insurance (UI) for long-term jobless workers. Some 250,000 unemployed workers a week are losing their unemployment benefits because they can’t find jobs.

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said the Republican’s action to

block unemployment benefits for the hardest-hit jobless Americans is an outrage–sadly, it’s simply the latest shame. All members, both Republicans and Democrats, must remember that come November, voters will be thinking about one thing—jobs.

Senate leaders scaled back the bill to win the 60 votes needed to end the Republican filibuster against the bill. The 56-40 vote included all Republicans present and Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.)

The extended UI program expired May 31 after the Senate left town for the Memorial Day recess without acting on a House-passed jobs bill that would have kept the long-term unemployment benefits program alive. The U.S. unemployment rate is near 10 percent, at least 15 million people are out of work and 6.8 million people have been out of work for 27 weeks or more.

The Republicans’ strident opposition to the jobs bill is out of step with voters. According to a June 11-13 USA Today/Gallup poll, 60 percent of Americans say they would favor “additional government spending to create jobs and stimulate the economy.”

Not only did Senate Republicans turn their backs on jobless workers–they also protected Wall Street investors and big oil companies like BP. The bill would have closed tax loopholes that allow hedge fund and other investments managers to shelter income at lower tax rates than working families pay on their income. It also increased the liability taxes on oil companies. Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) said Republicans

said “Yes” to the special interest groups they always stand by.

Further Senate action on the bill is not expected until next week.

Unionists, Environmentalists, Progressives Need to Take Over Democratic Party

06.11.10

Unionists, Environmentalists, Progressives Need to Take Over Democratic Party

It is time to purge the corporatists from the Democratic power structure. The real work of the Democratic Party is done by grassroots activists. These activists are the Democratic Party. They should run it at every level.

This conclusion has become clear in the aftermath of tainted Blanche Lincoln primary victory in Arkansas. It took massive voter disenfranchisement and the intervention of both former President Bill Clinton and President Barack Obama for Lincoln to squeak out a victory.

Obama still has not learned that the Obama Movement that put him in the White House was not really about Obama. It was about a set of progressive policies that constituted “change we can believe in.”

Former President Clinton started the process of going Republican-lite and selling out parts of the Democratic base around specific policy issues. Union members and American workers were shafted by the false promises surrounding “so-called free trade deals.” Poor Americans really suffered from some aspects of his welfare reform ideas. Deregulation helped create media consolidation that gave the corporations excessive control of public policy discussions and American politics.

Hilary Clinton was the driving force behind the most progressive policy goal of the Clinton Presidency which was the failed attempt at healthcare reform. America would have been a much better place if she had been President instead of Bill Clinton. One note of caution in her background was her position at one point on the Wal-Mart Board but her overall political history is solidly progressive.

President Clinton was not a bad on corporate issues as Reagan or both of the Bushes but he was pretty bad for a Democrat. He was not as bad as Senator Blanche Lincoln. Lincoln received more campaign money from Big Oil than any other Senator regardless of political party. She was the leading force in blocking the public option in healthcare reform.

Blanche Lincoln stopped the Employee Free Choice Act from even getting debated on the floor of the US Senate. She has a terrible record on trade policy, environmental protections, tax policy and deregulation. Blanche Lincoln has proven herself the most “corporatist” Senator in the relatively small “corporatist” wing of the Democratic Party.

Union activists, progressives and environmentalists are the majority of foot soldiers that go to battle for Democratic candidates at every level in every community of the nation. Along with civil rights leaders, civil libertarians, peace activists and the progressive Internet community, these activists give more money to elect Democrats than every corporation combined.

The corporations make the big donations and control the mainstream media but their values are really more Republican than Democratic. They value money over people. They value money over traditional American values. They value money over American patriotism. They value money over ethics, honesty and decency. Their values are directly at odds with the core values of the Democratic base.

We need to return to the values of FDR and the New Deal. We need to capture every Democratic Party office and drive out the corporatists. The Democratic Party is a much better institution because we drove out the Southern racist faction (and the northern one) and we need to do the same with the corporatists.

Obama needs to decide if he is going to the leader of this effort or an obstacle. If he elects to be an obstacle, he will not get a second term. If he joins in this populist effort, he might go down in history as an equal to our greatest American President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

With or without Obama, we need to take over every local Democratic Committee, every Democratic club and elect our “real Democrats” to public office. Government is not our enemy as long as it has not been captured by corporations. The US Constitution says we “the people” are the government. Corporations are not people despite the radical Right Wing Supreme Court rulings.

The Tea Party crowd has been captured and in some cases created by corporate forces. They cannot be the populist engine for “change you can believe in” but you and your friends can be that populist engine. Get angry, get active and fight corporatism regardless of political party.

Written by Stephen Crockett (host of Democratic Talk Radio http://www.DemocraticTalkRadio.com and Editor of Mid-Atlantic Labor.com http://www.midatlanticlabor.com) . Mail: 698 Old Baltimore Pike, Newark, Delaware 19702. Email: demlabor@aol.com. Phone: 443-907-2367.

Feel free to publish without prior approval.

Legislation being considered to help insolvent pension plans

06.02.10

June 2010, Allentown/Bethlehem/Easton edition of The Union News

Legislation being considered to help insolvent pension plans

BY PAUL LEESON
THEUNIONNEWSABE@AOL.COM

REGION, May 27th- The United States Congress is considering legislation that would help the multi-employer pension system remain solvent.

Pennsylvania United States Democratic Senator Robert Casey bill titled “Create Jobs and Save Benefits Act of 2010,” could result in taxpayer money being used to help union members pensions remain solvent.

Most of these union pensions are held in what are known as multi-employer pension funds. Created in 1974 as part of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, these funds are an agreement between a union and two or more employers to fund the pension of workers and retirees. It has been estimated the pension fund could be approximately $165 million in debt.

The rub is that many of the participating company’s have gone out of business but their employees remain in the system, and become the remaining company’s responsibility. As these multi-employer pension plans become more and more insolvent, the unions are faced with members pensions shortfalls.

Mr. Casey along with House of Representatives Earl Pomeroy (Democrat-North Dakota) and Pat Tiberi (Republican-Ohio), are sponsoring legislation to keep the benefits for the members of the Multi-Employer Pension Funds the same, but have them guaranteed by the Pension Benefits Guaranty Corportation (PBGC).

Meanwhile, Republican conservatives and their media allies are blasting the nine Republican’s in the Congress that support the legislation.

“We are asking that each Representative remove his or her cosponsorship of this blatant handout to unions, which are now asking the American people to bail them out of their own mismanagement of pensions. Compensating poor investment strategies, like those pursued by the multi-employer pension plans, only incentives further underfunding of these plans,” said Richard Manning, Director of Communications for Americans for Limited Government, a right-wing political organization.

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee held a hearing on Mr. Casey’s bill in Washington, DC on May 27th.

If the pension problem is not rectified the shortfall could result in cutting benefits, raising the retirement age, asking retired members to contribute to the fund or force unions to use dues money.

According to Mike Horton, a pension advisor and manager for some of the largest qualified and nonqualified pensions in the country, in most cases when someone refers to a “pension” they are referring to a Definded Benefit plan. He said in recent past, even those companies that were extremely prodent in choosing investments were hit hard because the investments that appeared to be high quality (low risk) turned out to be worthless or unsalable.

Jobs Bill = 1 Million Jobs. Tell Congress, Pass It Now!

05.26.10

Jobs Bill = 1 Million Jobs. Tell Congress, Pass It Now!

by Mike Hall

http://blog.aflcio.org/2010/05/26/jobs-bill-1-million-jobs-tell-congress-pass-it-now/

While the U.S. House is still hammering out a timetable for a vote on the Promoting American Jobs, Closing Tax Loopholes and Preventing Outsourcing Act of 2010 (H.R. 4213), lawmakers might move a little faster if they take a look at the latest report on the jobs bill. There are 1 million jobs at stake.

Call 877-442-6801 and tell Congress to pass it now!

The Economic Policy Institute (EPI) estimates that the bill’s package of aid to states, infrastructure projects, extension of unemployment insurance (UI) and COBRA benefits, creation of summer jobs, loan guarantees for small business and other provisions

will help save or create well over a million critically needed jobs.

The EPI report notes that not only will the UI and COBRA extensions benefit “the nearly 10 million Americans who have lost their jobs and are receiving unemployment compensation while they look for work,” but the safety net spending also will benefit “the economy as a whole by circulating cash into local communities and helping businesses avert further job cuts.”

Each $1 billion of unemployment compensation generates an estimated $1.63 billion to $2.15 billion of additional gross domestic product. If the unemployed did not receive insurance benefits, then their reduced consumption would be a serious drag on the economy, reducing demand for businesses’ goods and services, in turn leading businesses to reduce investments and lay off additional workers.

The jobs bill also will start the process of making Wall Street finally pay to restore the millions of jobs the Big Banks and financial institutions destroyed with their reckless and risky practices. EPI says the bill

closes a host of tax loopholes that have allowed many of the wealthiest Americans to pay a lower income tax rate than the average steel worker, encouraged businesses to move their operations overseas to escape U.S. taxes, and allowed some professionals to forgo paying their share of Medicare and Social Security taxes. These provisions will raise well over $40 billion, helping to pay for the bill’s job creation provisions and to make the tax code much fairer.

Those representatives who criticize government spending on job creation as ineffective or inefficient should read another new report. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) finds that in the first quarter of this year, the Obama administration’s stimulus package, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, created as many as 2.8 million jobs.

In addition, the recovery package lowered the unemployment by as much as 1.5 percent and

increased the number of full-time-equivalent (FTE) jobs by 1.8 million to 4.1 million compared with what those amounts would have been otherwise. (Increases in FTE jobs include shifts from part-time to full-time work or overtime and are thus generally larger than increases in the number of employed workers.)

That sure seems like a good use of taxpayer dollars. Click here for the full CBO report.

If you haven’t called your representative to urge him or her to vote in support of the jobs bill, there is still time. Call 877-442-6801 and urge your representative to vote for H.R. 4213 to create and save jobs and make Wall Street pay. Tell your representative a vote against the bill is a vote against jobs.

——————————————————-
EDITOR’S NOTE: Click on the AFL-CIO Blog link to find several important embedded links in this article like the CBO report.

Joe Sestak Wins Pennsylvania Primary, with Plenty of Labor Support on His Side

05.21.10

Joe Sestak Wins Pennsylvania Primary, with Plenty of Labor Support on His Side

UFCW members of UFCW Locals 23 and 1776 celebrated last night as the candidate that they worked for, Joe Sestak, surged to victory against incumbent Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter.

The New York Times reports that organized labor suffered a defeat when Sestak won last night, but for Pennsylvania UFCW members, BAC Local 1-PA members, USW 10-1 members, three APWU locals’ members, and other labor groups and organizations, that’s just plain wrong. Sure, some labor organizations endorsed Senator Specter, but others knew all along that Sestak was their man–the candidate for working families in Pennsylvania.

Kevin Kilroy, Political Director of UFCW Local 23, had this to say about the UFCW’s decision to endorse Sestak:

“Voters are tired of lukewarm politicians who are unresponsive to the needs of working families. Sestak has a proven record of getting things done in the House of Representatives. He seems to come down on the side of the average work a day person who is struggling to make ends meet. I think that the voters responded to him in kind.”

And UFCW Local 1776 put out this statement:

“Last night’s win by Joe Sestak was a great victory for the working men and women of Pennsylvania. Local 1776 and the entire UFCW family are proud to be a large part of his victory.

Our members told us loudly and clearly that it was time for a change in the US Senate. They know Joe Sestak. They like him and they trust him. They know that he shares our values and that we can count on him to stand up for what he believes in.

We decided to stand with Joe early in his campaign, and our membership supported us every step of the way. He’s going to be a great candidate in November against the anti-labor Pat Toomey. We look forward to working with Joe on a working families agenda that includes job creation and the Employee Free Choice Act.’

According to many UFCW, BAC, USW, and APWU members, other labor supporters, and working families across Pennsylvania, the right person for the job won last night. Now all of labor will certainly get behind him and help him win that Senate seat this fall.

Posted by Amber Sparks, UFCW on their Blog http://ufcw.blogspot.com/2010/05/ufcw-endorsed-candidate-joe-sestak-wins.html

——————————-
EDITOR’S NOTE: I highly encourage readers to visit the UFCW website and sign up for their newsletter. It is very well done and is full of useful information!

Legislation introduced to help in construction and renovation of medical schools

05.21.10

MAY 2010 Scranton/Wilkes-Barre/Hazleton edition of The Union News

Legislation introduced to help in construction and renovation of medical schools

BY PAUL TUCKER
THEUNIONNEWSSWB@AOL.COM

REGION, April 17th- Legislation was introduced by companion bills in the United States House of Representatives and the Senate respectively, which would help to construct new medical school facilities or renovate and improve existing facilities like the Commonwealth Medical College in Scranton.

The Medical School Construction Grant Act would help ensure that more physicians receive the education and training that they need to aid our country’s health care system at a time when more health care workers are desperately needed to address the high demands on the system.

Pennsylvania Democratic Senator and Scranton resident Robert Casey Jr. introduced the legislation in the Senate while House of Representative (Democrat-11th Legislative District) Paul Kanjorski introduced the legislation in the House.

“Countless reports in recent years have found that our country needs to educate and train more physicians in order to meet growing need for medical services. One of the key components of this task is ensuring there are enough medical schools to educate individuals to meet this need. In order to prevent predicted physician shortages, Congress must take action to help bolster medical school construction to spur job creation in the construction industry and increase the number of physicans,” said Mr. Casey.

The Commonwealth Medical College is currently under construction and being built with mostly unionized construction workers.

Report finds changes needed in Economic Development loans

05.21.10

APRIL 2010 Scranton/Wilkes-Barre/Hazleton edition of The Union News

Report finds changes needed in Economic Development loans

BY PAUL LEESON
THEUNIONNEWSSWB@AOL.COM

REGION, March 24th- Legislation now before the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Senate would implement accountability and transparency reforms of the economic development spending in the state.

According to a report released by the Keystone Research Center in Harrisburg, the level of transparency in economic development programs is better in Pennsylvania than most states, but it is not strong enough to answer such basic questions as do companies receiving subsidies actually create jobs, where do the subsidies go, what industries are subsidized, and what kind of wages do subsidized jobs pay?

“With the sharp economic downturn, now is the time to rethink how the state promotes economic development. These investments should be focuses on growing and developing innovative clusters of Pennsylvania businesses, rather than harvesting companies from other states,” said Stephen Herzenberg, PhD, and Keystone Research Executive Director.

The report also determined that the state’s economic development efforts rely too heavily on handing out checks to companies for locating or remaining in Pennsylvania. Instead, the state should rely more on helping create and expand homegrown businesses. Pennsylvania has been a leader in such “grow-your-own” programs since the 1980’s, but their funding has been slashed nearly in half since 2008-2009, stated Mr. Herzenberg.

The report recommendations include:

• Target traditional business subsidies to companies with good jobs, in industries that make sense for Pennsylvania, and to places with existing infrastructure near areas with high unemployment.
• Improve transparency and public disclosure by making Pennsylvania’s inline subsidy database a more complete and usable tool, with information on jobs created, wages and health care benefits provided, and the street address of business sites where subsidies are used.
• Create a unified development budget that provides an annual report to the state legislature cataloging and analyzing all state spending for economic development, including tax breaks.
• Enact economic development accountabilty legislation to require better public disclosure, strengthen job quality standards, and recapture subsides when companies don’t create jobs.